Matco Articles Home.
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese

Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com


 
We now have 53935 Articles From over 100 Categories
  Number Times Read : 504      
Categories

Accessories
Acne
Aerobics
Application Development
Arts
Ask an Expert
Banking
Beverages
Branding
Budgeting
Business
Buying
Cancer
Career
Cars and Trucks
Causes and Organizations
Cell Phones
Collecting
College and University
Communications
Computers
Cooking
Corporate
Crafts & Hobbies
Culture and Society
Current Affairs
Database Marketing
Death and Dying
DHTML
Directories
Disease & Illness
Diseases and Conditions
Domain Names
Drop Shipping
E-Commerce
Electronics
Employee Relations
Entertainment
Environment
Equipment
Ezines and Newsletters
Family
Fashion
Fiction
Finance
Financial Planning
Financing
Fitness
Free Tools and Resources
Gadgets and Gizmos
Gardening
Grants
Growth Topics
Health
Health & Fitness
Home
Home & Family
Home Business
HTML
Human Resources
Import Export
Infants and Toddlers
Internet
Internet Business
K-12
Men Only
Motivational
Motorcyles
Nature
Our Pets
Personal Development
Pets and Animals
Podcasting
Pregnancy and Family Pla
Presentation
Product Reviews
Recreation & Sports
Recreation and Leisure
Reference & Education
Relationship
Religion and Spiritualit
Screenplay
Search Engine Optimizati
Search Engines
Self Improvement
Selling
Shopping
Speaking
Sports
Start Up
Stock Market Investing
Strategic Planning
Structured Settlements
Supplements and Vitamins
Team Building
Technology
Teenagers
Telecommuting
Telesales
Television
Tools & Resources
Travel
Travel & Leisure
Vehicles
Video
Web Development
Weddings
Work Life Balance
World Affairs
Writing & Speaking
 
Stats
Total Articles: 53935
Total Authors: 41423
Total Downloads: 5299813


Newest Member
Ed Robinson
 


    Blade Debate Sharpens In Run Up To The Olympics

[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.matcomall.com/articles/rss.php?rss=315
By : Samantha Gilmartin    99 or more times read
Submitted 2013-01-18 18:20:51
Pistorius first came to the public attention when he competed in the 2004 summer Paralympics. Representing South Africa, the 17 year old from Gauteng came third in the 100m and picked up the gold medal in the 200m. As well as completing very successful turns in Paralympic competitions such as the 2007 World Cup, Pistorious began pushing for inclusion within international able-bodied competitions.

In 2005 for example, Pistorius was entered into South African Championships for able-bodied athletes and picked up gold medals in the 100, 200 and 400m races. This sparked a great deal of controversy within certain sporting communities regarding the suitability of Pestorius's carbon fibre 'Cheetah Flex-foot' blades. To his detractors, the similarity between "cheetah" and "cheater" proved an all too tempting homophonic substitution and even respected doctors and physicians became embroiled in some fairly unpleasant mudslinging.

Around this time the athletics' governing body, the IAAF, amended the rules around qualification to the Olympic Games to ban the use of any "technical device that incorporates springs, wheels or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over another athlete not using such a device"

Though the IAAF claimed the ruling was not aimed directly at Pistorius, when they began testing artificial limbs later that year they concluded that he was indeed in breech of the ruling and was given an unfair advantage by the Cheetah Flex-foot.

In January of this year the IAAF officially banned Pistorius from competing in the Olympic Games in Beijing because they ruled his prostheses illegal for use in their competitions. A scientific study carried out by professor Gert-Peter Bruggemann insisted that Pistorius's limbs used 25% less energy than able-bodied runners to run at the same speed, and that they led to 30% less mechanical work for lifting the body.

However, unhappy with the result, Pestorius and his team appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in April. When the matter came up for review in Lausanne, Switzerland, the court threw out the IAAF's case saying that there was insufficient evidence that Pistorius's prosthetics provided any advantage over able-bodied competitors. Over-turning the ban, the CAS unanimously decided that the 'Flex-foot' prosthetics do not provide an overall advantage for Pistorius in comparison to other 400m runners, when their disadvantages are taken into account. Citing the work of American experts, the CAS felt that the original IAAF ruling had not taken into account anything like the amount of variables that would affect Pistorius run over the course of a full race.

These disadvantages were, in part, laid out by Professor Robert Gailey who contended that Pistorius's prosthetics allow for a much slower start. Because the forward thrust from the feet and calves is absent in his case, Pistorius's burst from the blocks is severely hampered. He must, in effect, immediately stand up straight to start any considerable forward motion.

In addition, Gailey highlighted a separate study to the ones undertaken by the IAAF, that insisted that, whereas the average natural leg returns up to 240% of of the energy absorbed in each stride, the 'Flex-foot' returns only about 80% meaning that the natural leg provides much more spring.

The study from America insisted that the perceived advantages itemised by the IAAF were vastly outweighed by the numerous disadvantages. Pistorius may benefit from carrying less weight in his lower leg and suffer a lower rate of lactic acid build up, but he also lacks in the strength and direction of able-bodied athletes. In short, what you do not have you cannot control.

The CAS were quick to clarify that their verdict applied only to this specific case in hand and that the IAAF may, in the future, successfully prove that Pistorius's prosthetics do provide the runner with an advantage over other 400m runners. The arbitrators also insisted that this study legitimised only the model of prosthetics that Pistorius uses now and that any technological advancement would be met by further testing.

At this point in time the IAAF have accepted the CAS's ruling and Pistorius, still only 21, is cleared to try and qualify for the Olympics in Beijing. His personal best is still just over a second shy of the qualifying standard of 45.55 seconds but then that, almost, is immaterial. Whether Pistorius qualifies for this Olympic Games or not, his case will be held as a benchmark regardless.

The ruling of the CAS, and its subsequent backlash, form the basis of a far bigger debate in the sporting world. Namely, in the face of technological progression, what biological or philosophical truths do sporting bodies hold to be self evident? Can Oscar Pistorius be included within official competitions as the "fastest runner with no legs", or does this stray too far from the collective understanding of what an athlete should be and should look like? In other words, forgetting 'advantage' for the minute, is Pistorius's method just too different for him to be compared to that which is considered normal?

In the light of such intrinsic questions one thing is certain; that this problem is not going to go away. The advancement of the biological and the bionic in sport will neither die out nor will it be silenced. Control from boards like the IAAF are crucial for the integrity of sporting achievements to be maintained, but that control must always be fairly driven, clearly devised and unilaterally implemented to cope with the complexities of the human body and its thirst for success. The IAAF can either push to allow Pistorius into the Olympic competition or move to have him banned, what they cannot do now is go back.
Author Resource:- Samantha is a London fanatic and regular West End theatregoer.

Article From Mr Matco\'s Article Directory
Related Articles :

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software