Matco Articles Home.
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese

Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com


 
We now have 53945 Articles From over 100 Categories
  Number Times Read : 2363      
Categories

Accessories
Acne
Aerobics
Application Development
Arts
Ask an Expert
Banking
Beverages
Branding
Budgeting
Business
Buying
Cancer
Career
Cars and Trucks
Causes and Organizations
Cell Phones
Collecting
College and University
Communications
Computers
Cooking
Corporate
Crafts & Hobbies
Culture and Society
Current Affairs
Database Marketing
Death and Dying
DHTML
Directories
Disease & Illness
Diseases and Conditions
Domain Names
Drop Shipping
E-Commerce
Electronics
Employee Relations
Entertainment
Environment
Equipment
Ezines and Newsletters
Family
Fashion
Fiction
Finance
Financial Planning
Financing
Fitness
Free Tools and Resources
Gadgets and Gizmos
Gardening
Grants
Growth Topics
Health
Health & Fitness
Home
Home & Family
Home Business
HTML
Human Resources
Import Export
Infants and Toddlers
Internet
Internet Business
K-12
Men Only
Motivational
Motorcyles
Nature
Our Pets
Personal Development
Pets and Animals
Podcasting
Pregnancy and Family Pla
Presentation
Product Reviews
Recreation & Sports
Recreation and Leisure
Reference & Education
Relationship
Religion and Spiritualit
Screenplay
Search Engine Optimizati
Search Engines
Self Improvement
Selling
Shopping
Speaking
Sports
Start Up
Stock Market Investing
Strategic Planning
Structured Settlements
Supplements and Vitamins
Team Building
Technology
Teenagers
Telecommuting
Telesales
Television
Tools & Resources
Travel
Travel & Leisure
Vehicles
Video
Web Development
Weddings
Work Life Balance
World Affairs
Writing & Speaking
 
Stats
Total Articles: 53945
Total Authors: 41449
Total Downloads: 5480325


Newest Member
Ed Robinson
 


    Phone Lines Are Now Closed: Giving the Viewer What They Want Or Repackaging What They Have?

[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.matcomall.com/articles/rss.php?rss=398
By : Samantha Gilmartin    99 or more times read
Submitted 2013-01-18 18:33:42
The public talent show began humbly enough: when Opportunity Knocks bounded from radio to ITV in 1956 winners were selected by postal vote. Aahh, it all seems rather quaint now doesn't it? Of course, this lead, eventually, to votes being cast by premium phone lines, a system, some 25 years later, still in use.

Though the format of modern day programmes like X Factor or I'd Do Anything is similar to its televisual ancestors like Opp. Knocks or The Gong Show it differs in one vital aspect: which is, of course, that these shows offer a 'career' as a prize. The winners of X Factor are landed with recording contracts and album deals; in I'd Do Anything they are handed a lead role in a real West End show.

With the livelihoods of producers, directors and co-stars riding on the aptitude of the winners, one may legitimately find themselves wondering: what if the public get it wrong?

After all, the public record at choosing stars is less than, well, shall we say exemplary? Michelle McManus was dropped by her record company 19 Entertainment a year and a half after winning Pop Idol. Steve Brookstein on the other hand, lasted only eight months with Sony BMG after winning X Factor before he was dropped into obscurity.

Then, of course, there are different motives behind peoples' votes. The Eurovision Song Contest, for example, is rife with accusations of ethnic and political bias. At the close of this year's competition in Belgrade, the Russian act Dima Bilan emerged triumphant with 272 points. As many critics have pointed out though, Russia received the maximum 12 points from most of the former Soviet states. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Armenia all chose the Russian entry as the winner. Even esteemed Eurovision pundit Terry Wogan remarked, as the result was being announced, that "This is no longer a music contest"

Herein, it seems, lies the problem: if you allow the public to choose, you must accept their choice, motives and all. You cannot expect a collective of millions of people to value the same things equally and, if they want to vote (or indeed, not vote) for certain competitors for political or social or ethnic reasons, then you cannot stop them.

And this problem is not just confined to popular culture. Carol Levine expands the conflict of art and democracy in her book Provoking Democracy: Why we Need the Arts. She describes art as 'democracy's friendly enemy' prodding and provoking its shortfalls. Democracy and art then, it would seem, may not be the cosiest of bedfellows.

Allowing the public to help mould their celebrities whether they be novelty variety acts or West End starlets is certainly very popular but is it very helpful? In this digital age of rocketing bandwith and countless content streaming services, our choice of entertainment has never been paralleled; but has this improved matters? With phone in talent shows and public contests we certainly have unfettered access, but whether that is access to great art or great spectacle is still up for debate.
Author Resource:- Samantha is a London theater fanatic and regular West End theatergoer.

Article From Mr Matco\'s Article Directory
Related Articles :

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software